| Part III - Various Discussions
							The Four Minimum Points of Gait and Foot-lineThe Eight Fundamental Parameters of GaitThe Five Straight Lines Forward for a Single 
							StepReal vs Apparent RotationWalking is a Controlled StaggerThe Primary Goals of Walking are Distance and 
							DirectionThe Standard Start PositionHeel vs Heel-point ContactDirection Changes Over the StepStep, Carry and StrideStraddle-line, Straddle, Straddle Width, Stride 
							Width, Step Width, Walking Base and Walking StraddleAberrationsVectorsAccuracy vs PrecisionLimb DominanceThe Rotating Reference GridBalanceMovements Affecting the Eight Parameters   1. The Four Minimum Points of Gait and 
						Foot-line
 The four minimum points of 
						gait are:
 1) step-heel-point,
 2) step-pelvic 
						joint,
 3) rear-pelvic joint,
 4) start-heel-point.
 
 Deconstruction and simplification of the skeleton 
						leaves the two heel-points as contact with the ground, 
						and the pelvic joints as the only necessary rotation 
						points, with 3 straight lines connecting the points. 
						Measurements based on the projection of the 4 points 
						onto any 2D plane gives all the distance and direction 
						information for a person walking, wrt that plane.
 
 The foot-line should be included if possible, but it 
						isn't required. Without it, foot and push-off angles are 
						recorded as a single angular change, and foot-line 
						rotations over aberrations can't be determined.
 
 Also, the heel-points are normally the points of contact 
						with the ground if we had peg legs that went to points. 
						So if a person was wearing shoes, the heel-point would 
						be on the bottom of the shoe, not on the sole of the 
						foot. However, this method allows for the choice of 
						different points, eg. using the sole of the foot even 
						though wearing shoes, as long as the interpretation 
						takes it into account.
 
 The entire measurement 
						system is derived from the detailed analysis of the 
						relationships between these 4 points and foot-line.
   2. The Eight Fundamental Parameters of Gait
 The 8 fundamental parameters of gait are lines and 
						angles derived from the projection of the 4 minimum 
						points of gait and foot-line, onto a specific 2D plane 
						(usually the floor). They organize the contributions to 
						distance and direction from specific body segments and 
						rotation points (joints).
 
 There must be a change 
						in at least one of the fundamental parameters for there 
						to be any change in distance and/or direction, and a 
						change in any one must show as a change in distance 
						and/or direction.
 
 Distance:
 1) rear-leg-line
 2) step-out-line
 3) straddle-line
 4) 
						pelvic-stretch
 
 Direction:
 4) foot offset
 5) 
						foot angle
 6) push-off angle
 
 Distance and 
						direction:
 7) aberration
 
 Walking is the 
						manipulation of these parameters.
 
 1) and 2) are 
						the 3rd and 4th straight lines over the step, resp.
 
 Note: Step, stride and walking base are not 
						fundamental parameters, they are products of them.
 
 Also, 3) straddle-line and 4) pelvic-stretch, are 
						the sides of a right triangle, with the pelvis-line as 
						the hypotenuse. Technically, the pelvis-line should be 
						the fundamental parameter (since it’s directly based on 
						a body segment), not the other 2. However, since pelvic 
						stretch and straddle-line are far more descriptive wrt 
						the important elements of gait, I prefer to use them 
						instead.
   3. The Five Straight Lines Forward for a 
						Single Step
 The 4 minimum points and 
						foot-line define a series of 5 "straight lines forward" 
						which are relevant over the course of a single step. 
						These lines describe sequential direction changes.
 
 1) step-foot-line of the previous step,
 2) 
						foot-line after aberrations,
 3) rear-leg-line,
 4) 
						step-out-line and,
 5) step-foot-line of the current 
						step.
 
 The rear-leg and step-out lines are 
						fundamental parameters, the foot-line isn't.
 
 Foot-lines represent 3 of the straight lines, but, since 
						it’s not a required element, only very useful. If there 
						was no foot-line, there would be 2 straight lines. The 
						first would be the rear-leg-line, and the second the 
						step-out-line. This shows why adding the foot-line is 
						desirable, it adds quite a bit of info because each 
						foot-line is affected by different factors.
 
 Each 
						line represents what would be the straight line forward 
						if there were no further direction changes. 1) would be 
						the straight line if there were no foot offsets, foot or 
						push-off angles, or aberrations. When there's an 
						aberration, the foot-line, 2), becomes the straight 
						line. When there's push-off angle, the rear-leg-line, 3) 
						then becomes the straight line and, if there’s foot 
						offset 4) becomes the straight line forward. 5) becomes 
						the straight line if there’s foot angle. 5) is 1) for 
						the next step. (4 and 5 occur at the same time.)
 
 These represent a continuum which is defined by body 
						segments, and allows the accurate determination of 
						direction changes within the step, and over the entire 
						path. This should help with the interpretation of data 
						in many areas of gait research.
   4. Real vs Apparent Rotation
 Rotations at either pelvic joint or along the 
						step-out-line axis result in direction changes, as well 
						as others, but it doesn't have to be real rotation.
 
 Since the step-out-line is a vector sum, the 
						specific orientation of the component vectors could lead 
						to a lateral heel-point shift without any actual 
						rotation at the step-pelvic joint. (The specifics of 
						this would have to be studied.) This would be measured 
						as a rotation at the step-pelvic joint, even though it 
						had nothing to do with it. Also, since this is a 2D 
						projection, other movements along the z-axis may lead to 
						apparent rotations.
 
 Real vs apparent rotation is 
						irrelevant to the measurements. It would be very 
						important, though, to other aspects of a full clinical 
						analysis. This highlights the fact that this method, 
						though extensive, is still only one part of the greater 
						analysis.
   5. Walking is a Controlled Stagger
 When a person walks, they are manipulating the 8 
						parameters. The degree of control over this manipulation 
						is the factor which defines when a person is 
						"staggering".
 
 The distance parameters aren't as 
						important, but variation of any of the direction 
						parameters leads to a change in direction.
 
 Distance deviations don't have to be compensated for, 
						but if at any time there's a change to one of the 
						direction parameters, there isn't only that turn, but 
						there must be a future, compensating turn in order to 
						stay on the straight path. This is by manipulation of 
						the next parameters in that step, as well as the 
						parameters for the next steps. If the compensating turn 
						isn't exactly right, there has to be another 
						compensating turn farther along the path, etc.
 
 Someone who's drunk has less control over the direction 
						changes, and the compensating turns, and shows greater 
						lateral movement than normal, as well as other gait 
						abnormalities. The classic drunken stagger.
 
 For a 
						sober person, each step virtually certainly has 
						direction deviations and/or compensating turns. The 
						upper body may be perfectly stable, but the lower frame 
						is changing direction by small amounts. A well 
						controlled stagger.
   6. The Primary Goals of Walking are Distance 
						and Direction
 Humans evolved the ability 
						to walk in order to better get from point A to point B. 
						Since a person's body is directional, the path to B will 
						not only include a distance to be traveled, but also a 
						direction change from straight ahead.
 
 Physical 
						processes developed to accomplish these goals, using the 
						available framework, which also required the balancing 
						of a large, gangly mass over the lower locomotion 
						framework, the minimization of energy expenditure, the 
						versatility necessary to traverse any terrain, and the 
						breadth of control to quickly alter the walking pattern 
						to suit virtually any immediate choice (such as jumping, 
						changing speed or direction).
 
 Extremely complex 
						muscle controls have evolved, but, if distance and 
						direction are the primary goals, then it’s reasonable to 
						assume muscular and other controls developed to 
						facilitate these, and, so, should be definable as 
						specific sets associated with each.
 
 That's why 
						the plane of the floor is the most revealing, and why 
						the 8 parameters should be the central correlation for 
						all areas of gait research, since they directly show 
						distance and direction changes involved during the step, 
						defined wrt body segments and rotation points (ie., 
						specific movements and muscle action).
 
 Also, 
						since each step is an individual, the ability to 
						separate the unique direction and distance variations 
						over each step, which are directly related to various 
						mass movements, should aid in the analysis of vector 
						data such as force, velocity, etc.
   7. The Standard Start Position
 Definition of the theoretical standard start 
						position is required for the separation of step and 
						carry lines. Only 3 of the minimum points of gait are 
						needed to define it, the step and rear-pelvic joints and 
						the start-heel-point, and it's the position when all 
						changes due to the previous step are accounted for by 
						rotations and/or heel-point shifts, and after aberration 
						and push-off angle shifts and rotations.
 
 The 
						first 2 direction changes, aberrations and push-off 
						angle, change the Step Model grid orientation, and, 
						hence, the position of the standard start position.
 
 To visualize it, imagine yourself frozen at the 
						instant of heel-contact. Now draw yourself back along a 
						straight line, keeping the same straddle-line, until 
						you're standing straight up at a stop, with the 
						step-foot in the air, and the left and right feet at a 
						distance of straddle-line apart, not pelvis line.
 
 If you had any pelvic stretch in that step (which 
						everyone probably has), since this would decrease the 
						straddle-line but have no effect on the pelvis-line, you 
						couldn’t stand at the standard start position in real 
						life. But, it's still a valid standard reference because 
						of the vector nature of all the measured distances.
 
 Also, the foot never has to pass over the standard 
						position, and the person never has to take up the 
						orientation of the standard grid except at heel-contact.
 
 This provides a separate, consistent measurement 
						standard, the reference-heel-point, which is still 
						defined by the heel-contact (or any other) snapshots. In 
						the Step Model, the reference and start foot-models 
						define the standard start position.. The reference-foot 
						model represents the foot that's in the air (the 
						step-foot), and the reference-heel-point is the 
						stop/start point for carry/step lines, resp.
   8. Heel vs Heel-point Contact
 The time of the snap-shot which defines the 
						parameters is the instant of heel-contact. But, 
						heel-edge is not the point used for measurements. All 
						measurements are to and from heel-points.
 
 The 
						heel-contact time point is chosen so movements due to 
						aberrations can be isolated. Usually, the heel-point is 
						still in the air at heel-contact, but that doesn't 
						matter to the measurements. Aberrations are highly 
						variable, and the ability to separate the distance and 
						direction changes they cause greatly simplifies the 
						analysis and allows far greater accuracy.
 
 The 
						position of the heel-point contact is important, though, 
						since this would be the best start/stop point for field 
						measurements. This position, which can be estimated from 
						a footprint, is the most accurate field determination of 
						heel-point position. It includes all or part of an 
						aberration, but may still be very close to it's position 
						at heel-edge contact. A more detailed footprint analysis 
						could estimate deviations.
 
 As long as it's 
						consistent, and since changes are the most important, 
						any discrepancy in position of heel-point at heel-edge 
						vs heel-point contact may be insignificant, or at least 
						tolerable. This would be a matter for study.
 
 Also, since the heel-point is a point on the body, not 
						the floor, there's the potential for time dependant 
						analysis of all the parameters. The 4 points and line 
						are always definable, whether in the air or not, but the 
						interpretation would have to be modified for movement 
						through the air and angular transition wrt the pelvis 
						and leg-lines.
 
 Heel contact is considered the end 
						of the current step and start of the next step.
   9. Direction Changes Over the Step
 The 4 direction parameters are not expressed at the 
						same time, or in the same way, over the step.
 
 Aberrations and push-off angle are due to movements 
						associated with the planted (opposite) foot, over single 
						and part of double stance phases.
 
 Foot offset and 
						foot angle occur over swing phase of the step foot, and 
						are established at heel-contact.
 
 So, aberrations 
						is the 1st, push-off angle the 2nd, and foot angle and 
						offset occur at the same time and are the 3rd and 4th 
						direction changes.
 
 7 of the 8 fundamental 
						parameters are defined by a single snapshot, but 
						aberrations require the comparison of consecutive 
						snapshots, wrt foot angle change and heel-point shift of 
						the planted foot.
 
 Foot offset, aberrations and 
						push-off angle require linear translation to express 
						normally, while foot angle can be expressed while 
						stepping in place.
 
 Within the same step, foot 
						offset and foot angle can compensate for aberration and 
						push-off angle deviations, but not vice versa. Push-off 
						angle can compensate for aberrations.
 
 Only 
						certain (real or apparent) actions can change direction:
 1) aberrations – spins, slides and all other movements 
						of the planted foot, between sequential heel-contacts
 2) push-off angle - appropriate muscle action in the 
						planted foot's leg and foot, as well as momentum and 
						other path specifics
 3) foot angle - rotation of the 
						foot-line around the 3D axis of the step-out-line
 4) 
						foot offset - step and/or rear pelvic joint rotation 
						(lateral and/or vertical), and rotation at the step-knee 
						and/or ankle joint which leads to heel-point shift.
   
						Previous     
						Next 
						Index   
						Forward   
						Part I   
						Part II   
						Part III   
						Part IV    
						Part VCopyright 
						© 2008
   |